Disliking the moral logic of the pro-life view does not make the pro-life view false. Many people think the pro-life view can be dismissed rather than refuted on grounds that they don't like where the logic leads, but this clearly will not work.

All of the arguments used to promote abortion as a positive good for society, assume the unborn are not human.

To assume that a just war is morally equivalent to opposing abortion is morally indefensible and logically silly.

The pro-life argument is about one thing: Is it okay to intentionally kill innocent human beings? Any distraction from that central question will harm our efforts to save children.

N.T. Wright is peddling misguided abortion nonsense not pastoral theology. His arguments for termination in cases like rape or deformity are flawed. Get smart on abortion, not dumb with clear, pro-life insight.

The pro-life view can be defended even in the hard cases. Today we consider psychological vs. moral complexity, intentional killing vs. foreseeing death, and how to handle inquirers vs. crusaders effectively.

When abortion advocates like comedian Jimmy Kimmel appeal to fundamental rights, they need to answer the question, "where do those rights come from and to whom do they apply?"

Explore the debate on the basis of human value, challenging self-awareness and advocating for human nature and tackle the question of whether Christians can work with others on abortion without compromising beliefs, focusing on common moral goals.

It is no longer the case that mere political differences can be swept aside. In today's world, the political is the moral.

Just because a pastor claims to be Biblical on the issue of abortion doesn’t mean he is Biblical.