Our critics have lousy arguments, all they do is attack you personally. A good dose of courage will help you counter punch effectively.

Pro-lifers should certainly show empathy for victims of sexual assault. It does not follow though that there’s no right way to treat their children.

It’s vital that pro-lifers make arguments that affirm our basic principles, not ones that deny it.

Don’t let your opponents get away with simply asserting a bunch of things they never have to defend. Make them formally state their case.

When your opponent makes an assertion rather than a formal argument, the burden of proof is on them to defend their own assertion, not on you to refute it. Knowing that makes all the difference in a conversation you might have on abortion.

The pro-life argument is either sound or unsound. Dismissing it with a phony appeal to tolerance is not going to work.

When Christians engage politically, they are doing so for the right reasons: that of loving their neighbor and promoting human flourishing.

On today’s episode, we dissect a commenter’s arguments against the pro-life stance. We learn to use logic and our syllogism to reveal the fallacies in his reasoning.

It’s not pro-lifers who refuse to protect children once they’re born. It’s pro-abortion Democrats.