Instead of refuting pro-life arguments, most of our critics simply emote. We will examine an encounter where Charlie Kirk interviews student on abortion to see this in action.

Your job as a pro-life apologist is not to beat people up by cornering them with gotcha points. Your job is to give them something to think about.

Saving lives or changing laws is not an either/or proposition. We should do both.

Conservative pro-lifers were told for months that Obamacare would never fund abortion. Well, guess what? It does.

When people appeal to love to cover up obvious external evil, they are not pitching love, they are pitching compromise.

Disliking the moral logic of the pro-life view does not make the pro-life view false. Many people think the pro-life view can be dismissed rather than refuted on grounds that they don’t like where the logic leads, but this clearly will not work.

All of the arguments used to promote abortion as a positive good for society, assume the unborn are not human.

To assume that a just war is morally equivalent to opposing abortion is morally indefensible and logically silly.

The pro-life argument is about one thing: Is it okay to intentionally kill innocent human beings? Any distraction from that central question will harm our efforts to save children.