Post-Roe Pro-Life Strategy: Why the Movement Must Pivot

Post-Roe Pro-Life Strategy: Why the Movement Must Pivot

Scott Klusendorf sits down with Dr. Mark Newman to discuss his new book Pivot, which lays out a strategy for the pro-life movement in a post-Roe v. Wade world. They examine why abortion rights keep winning at the ballot box in deep red states, how pastors have been left unequipped by their seminaries, and why so-called equal protection bills are unenforceable — and may even cost unborn lives. Discover what it will take for the pro-life movement to work smarter and save the most lives possible on this episode of The Case for Life.

Prudence vs. Premature Zealotry: The Biblical Case for Political Wisdom

Prudence vs. Premature Zealotry: The Biblical Case for Political Wisdom

When pro-abortion advocates bristle at the label and insist they’re merely “pro-choice,” they reveal a telling instinct to apologize for something they claim is perfectly fine. Scott Klusendorf unpacks why that retreat to 1990s “safe, legal, and rare” language collapses under a single question—choice to do what?—and exposes the moral relativism quietly propping up the whole evasion. Tune in to sharpen your ability to cut through the fog and press for real clarity on this episode of the Case for Life.

Why Not Just Be Pro-Abortion?

Why Not Just Be Pro-Abortion?

When pro-abortion advocates bristle at the label and insist they’re merely “pro-choice,” they reveal a telling instinct to apologize for something they claim is perfectly fine. Scott Klusendorf unpacks why that retreat to 1990s “safe, legal, and rare” language collapses under a single question—choice to do what?—and exposes the moral relativism quietly propping up the whole evasion. Tune in to sharpen your ability to cut through the fog and press for real clarity on this episode of the Case for Life.

After-Birth Abortion? Answering Giubilini, Minerva, and Boonin

After-Birth Abortion? Answering Giubilini, Minerva, and Boonin

Scott Klusendorf wraps up his series on the academic thinkers driving pro-abortion thought. Giubilini and Minerva shocked the world by arguing that if abortion is permissible, so is killing newborns—because neither fetus nor newborn is an “actual person.” David Boonin takes a different path, conceding that you are identical to the embryo you once were, yet denying you had a right to life back then. Learn how to answer both arguments—one based on identity, the other on rights—and see why either way the conclusion is deadly, on this episode of The Case for Life.

Michael Tooley and the Pattern Behind Pro-Abortion Thought

Michael Tooley and the Pattern Behind Pro-Abortion Thought

On this episode of the Case for Life, Scott Klusendorf breaks down philosopher Michael Tooley’s mental continuity theory, which claims a right to life requires an actual (not just potential) self-aware subject with memories linking its experiences over time, meaning Tooley argues that infanticide can be justified. Scott exposes the recurring patterns beneath this and similar arguments, body-self dualism and arbitrarily chosen traits, showing why species membership and human nature, not cognitive performance, ground human equality. Once you learn to recognize these patterns, you’ll be equipped to challenge them with confidence.