It is an absolute necessity for your student. We should never assume that our kids understand the truth content of the Christian worldview. They must be taught it.

Megan Almon joins Scott Klusendorf to dissect the progressive “christian” defense of abortion championed by “pastor” Rebecca Todd Peters. They examine how Peters replaces objective biblical truth with standpoint epistemology and reduces morality and ethics to the subjective lived experience. They reiterate that the Christian worldview is not a matter of personal preference but an objective explanation of reality that offers a unique path to hope and healing through the gospel.

When Christians flip-flop on abortion, it’s not because they’ve encountered more persuasive arguments. It’s because of their own self-interest and a failure to have a biblically informed worldview.

A few thoughts about the Super Bowl and its relationship to pro-life apologetics from Scott to illustrate why Christians must avoid category errors when engaging in the public square. He also refutes claims of political figures regarding the impact of pro-life laws on emergency medical care.

No matter how vicious the attack against the pro-lifer, the pro-lifer’s argument stands.

The attempts by woke activists to force Christians to make hasty judgments is back in full force. Pro-life Christians need to be careful thinkers, not those who, due to peer pressure, jump to unwarranted conclusions.

Prolifers need to be careful not to assume the worst motives in other Christians they disagree with.

Some of the arguments we’ll hear defending abortion in the new year will be rehashes of old arguments and some of them will have an entirely new twist. Either way, we must be ready.

In defending the dignity of disabled persons, we need to be careful not to assume the dehumanizing rhetoric of secularists.